Note: “power” includes money, influence, control, women, humanity, resources, everything people need and want.

We perceive that several / many factions compete for power, we see the competition before us, and a story unfolds that eventually becomes known as “history”. In fact, the power brokers compete for the story itself before anything happens. The story we are told need be true just barely enough for the masses to accept it and act on it. Power is actually contained in the story itself (not in fighting directly with brute force to make the story real, reality is barely relevant). “History is written by the victors” unfolds constantly, not just after wars are won and lost. Power brokers compete not directly for power, but for a version of the story / history in which they have the most power. If you fight a war, you risk losing all. If you compete over what story will be told, you guarantee your position among the power brokers regardless of the outcome of any war or competition.

This accounts for the massive inconsistencies in the story we are told.

This is consistent with the CONCEPT of freemasonry, which I think is relevant as an IDEA if no longer as an organization.

The dumber humanity is, the greater the inconsistencies in the story can be. The dumber humanity, the more flexibility you have in writing the story. This accounts for governments apparently wanting people to be dumb.

As humanity becomes more unified and as it becomes more difficult to convince humans to fight other humans, the power brokers introduce things like microbes and aliens to be our enemies.

As humanity becomes more unified / “one-world-government-like” it looks more and more like a single unified faction telling the story, so when a conspiracy is theorized, it is automatically assumed to be suggesting a single cabal controlling it all even if it’s actually still a competition behind the scenes.

A football game in 4K looks like two teams competing. A football game viewed from outside the stadium (which is where we stand) looks like some people making a bunch of money selling tickets, which is indeed what we perceive. Neither side really loses, that is agreed on ahead of time. They (“they”) aren’t stupid.

Snake Eyes movie quote: “That’s called the first draft of history.“

Typical Businesses

• Media. News, movies, music, everything.
• Psychology
• Banking
• Politics
• Pharmaceuticals 
• Personal security to include the Secret Service
• Space, NASA, Space Force
• Modeling, fashion, beauty pageants
• Porn 
• Pedophilia
• Orphanages
• Human trafficking
• Coroners 
• Piping?

Money Drives Media

I think one of the biggest misconceptions we have is that media makes money by advertising, especially that successful media makes significant money by accurately or even sensationally reporting politics or resonating with people. We imagine that if some media makes enough money, it will be successful and drive money and power. I understand that it can. I understand the concept. However, I think the reality is that political commentary of all kinds is almost always bought as an investment to drive what is popular, to control what people think. Media is purchased as an investment in the creation of politics, an investment in influence on the story that shapes and constructs the collective human consciousness.

Power money drives media and the media narrative. The media never drives enough money to influence real power.

Advertising revenue can be assume to be zero for the purposes of knowing which media is relevant. Ratings are only relevant to know which media is worth investing in for influence and power by those who are big enough to profit from the broad narrative driven by media.

Media is always telling you what to think. Media is never really reporting what you have decided to think.